What Semrush Doesn't Track: Your AI Visibility Blind Spots

What Semrush Doesn't Track: Your AI Visibility Blind Spots
π TL;DR
Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit tracks mentions across 20+ AI platforms, but lacks Google Search Console integration for accurate traffic attribution
58.5% of U.S. searches end without a clickβtraditional traffic metrics miss the full picture
Reddit is cited in 176.89% of ChatGPT finance queries (nearly 2x per prompt), yet most brands focus on owned content
Only 6-27% of mentioned brands also rank as trusted citation sources
The gap isn't data collectionβit's actionable insights that connect visibility to content strategy
Executive Summary
The SEO landscape has fundamentally shifted. With AI Overviews appearing in up to 24.61% of Google searches at peak and 58.5% of searches ending without a click, traditional ranking metrics tell an incomplete story.
Semrush launched its AI Visibility Toolkit to address this shiftβand it's genuinely useful for basic monitoring. But after analyzing the platform alongside dedicated AI visibility tools, we've identified critical blind spots that affect strategic decision-making.
This analysis examines what Semrush tracks, where it falls short, and how to fill those gaps.
Methodology
This analysis synthesizes data from:
Official Semrush documentation and product pages (verified December 2025)
Semrush's own research studies on AI Overviews and zero-click searches
Third-party tool comparisons from RevenueZen, Search Engine Land, and industry analysts
Community feedback from Reddit r/SEO, G2, and Capterra reviews
Ekamoira's internal testing of AI visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI
The Zero-Click Reality: Why Traditional Metrics Fall Short
Before examining Semrush's AI capabilities, let's establish why AI visibility tracking matters at all.
Source: Semrush Zero-Click Study, 2024
π Key Finding: 58.5% of U.S. searches and 59.7% of E.U. searches now end without a click to any website. (Semrush, 2024)
This isn't a future trendβit's current reality. And it's accelerating:
Metric | January 2025 | July 2025 | November 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
AI Overviews % of queries | 6.49% | 24.61% (peak) | 15.69% |
Commercial intent queries | 8.15% | β | 18.57% |
Transactional queries | 1.98% | β | 13.94% |
Source: Semrush AI Overviews Study
The composition of AI-triggered queries is shifting dramatically. Informational queries dropped from 91.3% to 57.1%, while commercial and transactional intent surged. This means AI Overviews increasingly affect purchase decisions, not just research.
π¬ "Impressions go up (more people see your content). But clicks go down (because users get their answer right there)." β SEO professional, via Semrush
What Semrush AI Visibility Actually Tracks
Let's give credit where it's due. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit offers genuine capabilities:
Core Features
Feature | What It Does | Usefulness |
|---|---|---|
AI Visibility Score | Tracks how often your brand appears in AI responses | β Useful baseline |
Multi-Platform Monitoring | Monitors ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot + 20 more | β Comprehensive coverage |
Sentiment Analysis | Shows positive/negative/neutral mentions | β Brand health indicator |
Competitor Gaps | Identifies prompts where rivals appear but you don't | β Opportunity discovery |
Prompt Research | Explores real user prompts and AI responses | β Content ideation |
What Semrush Does Well
Breadth of coverage β Tracking 20+ AI platforms is genuinely impressive
Competitor benchmarking β Seeing share of voice against rivals provides strategic context
Sentiment tracking β Understanding how AI describes your brand matters for reputation
Integration with existing workflow β For Semrush users, it's one dashboard
π‘ Pro Tip: If you're already paying for Semrush's SEO suite, the AI Visibility add-on extends your existing investment. The question is whether "basic monitoring" is enough.
The Blind Spots: What Semrush Misses
Despite its capabilities, Semrush's AI visibility offering has significant gaps. These aren't minor omissionsβthey affect strategic decision-making.
Blind Spot #1: No Google Search Console Integration
β οΈ Critical Gap: Semrush explicitly notes that GA/GSC integration is "Coming soon"βmeaning you can't connect AI visibility data to actual traffic and conversions.
This is the biggest limitation. Semrush shows where you appear in AI responses, but can't tell you:
Which AI mentions actually drove traffic
How AI visibility correlates with conversions
Whether your AI presence is improving real business outcomes
Without this connection, you're flying blind on ROI.
The problem in practice: Semrush's traffic estimates are already known to diverge from GSC reality. As one user noted:
π¬ "Traffic analysis if not connected to GSC or Analytics is wrong af. Was telling my website... 16k visits per month while... it is only 4k/month."
If their traditional traffic estimates are off by 4x, how accurate are their AI visibility metrics?
Blind Spot #2: Basic Monitoring vs. Actionable Insights
What Semrush Provides | What You Actually Need |
|---|---|
"You appeared in 15 ChatGPT responses" | "You were cited as authoritative in 3, mentioned in passing in 12" |
"Competitor X has higher visibility" | "Here's the content gap causing that, and how to fix it" |
"Sentiment is 70% positive" | "These 3 topics are dragging down your sentiment score" |
"AI Overview appeared for this keyword" | "Here's content optimized to earn that citation" |
Semrush shows data. Dedicated AI visibility tools connect that data to action.
π Key Finding: "Semrush's AI visibility toolkit is excellent for basic AI monitoring. But if you need in-depth analysis and actionable insights, the tool might not be able to come through." (Industry Analysis)
Blind Spot #3: Citation Authority Hierarchy
Not all AI mentions are equal. There's a hierarchy:
Citation Hierarchy (Most to Least Valuable)
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β LEVEL 1: Cited as Authoritative Source β β "According to [Brand]..."
β β’ AI uses you as the definitive answer β
β β’ Highest trust and recall β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β LEVEL 2: Mentioned but Not Cited β β "Brands like [X] and [Y]..."
β β’ Brand awareness without authority β
β β’ Warm opportunity for content β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β LEVEL 3: Competitor Cited, You Absent β β "[Competitor] recommends..."
β β’ Cold opportunity β
β β’ Content gap to address β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β LEVEL 4: No AI Presence β β Topic not covered
β β’ Unknown or emerging topic β
β β’ May not be worth pursuing β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Semrush tracks mentions, but doesn't clearly distinguish between "cited as authoritative" and "mentioned in passing." This matters enormously for prioritization.
π Key Finding: Only 6-27% of most-mentioned brands also rank as trusted citation sources. Being mentioned isn't the same as being trusted. (Semrush AI Search Study)
Blind Spot #4: Reddit's Hidden Authority
One of the most surprising findings from Semrush's own research contradicts traditional SEO wisdom:
Source: Semrush AI Search Visibility Study
π Key Finding: Reddit appears in 176.89% of ChatGPT finance queriesβnearly twice per prompt. Corporate marketing sites "rarely crack top source lists." (Semrush, 2025)
What this means: While brands focus on optimizing owned content, AI models disproportionately trust community discussions. Semrush can show you're not being cited, but doesn't help you build the community presence that AI actually values.
Blind Spot #5: Content Strategy Integration
Here's the workflow gap:
Semrush Workflow | What's Missing |
|---|---|
1. Identify visibility gap | β |
2. See competitor is cited | β |
3. Understand why they're cited | β Limited |
4. Generate optimized content | β Not connected |
5. Track content impact on visibility | β Coming soon |
Semrush's content tools (ContentShake AI, SEO Writing Assistant) operate separately from AI visibility data. You can see gaps, but filling them requires manual work or separate tools.
The Market Gap: What Dedicated Tools Offer
Specialized AI visibility tools address these blind spots with varying approaches:
Tool | Starting Price | Key Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
Semrush AI | +$99/mo add-on | Integrated with SEO suite | Basic monitoring, no GSC |
Profound | $499/mo | Enterprise-grade analytics | Expensive for SMBs |
Peec AI | β¬89/mo (~$95) | Multi-model tracking | Limited content integration |
Otterly.AI | $29/mo | Affordable for solopreneurs | Fewer platforms |
Ekamoira | $79 one-time | Visibility β Content pipeline | Focused on 3 core platforms |
Feature Comparison Matrix
Feature | Semrush | Profound | Ekamoira |
|---|---|---|---|
AI Platform Coverage | 20+ | 10+ | 3 (Google AI, ChatGPT, Perplexity) |
GSC Integration | Coming soon | No | β Native |
Content Generation | Separate tool | No | β Integrated pipeline |
Citation vs Mention Distinction | Limited | Yes | Yes (Warm/Cold/Cited) |
Actionable Recommendations | Basic | Yes | Yes |
Price Entry | ~$239/mo (Pro + AI) | $499/mo | $79 one-time |
Filling the Blind Spots: A Practical Framework
Whether you use Semrush or not, here's how to address these gaps:
Step 1: Establish Your Source of Truth
Don't rely solely on estimated data. Connect to Google Search Console for:
Actual traffic numbers (not estimates)
Real click-through rates
Verified ranking positions
π‘ Pro Tip: Use a GSC MCP server to query your search data directly in AI assistants like Claude or ChatGPT. This gives you real data, not estimates.
Step 2: Track Citation Authority, Not Just Mentions
Create a simple spreadsheet tracking:
Prompt | Platform | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
"Best [product]" | ChatGPT | Cited | Maintain content |
"How to [task]" | Perplexity | Mentioned | Upgrade to authoritative |
"[Competitor] vs alternatives" | Google AI | Absent | Create comparison content |
Step 3: Monitor Reddit and Community Discussions
Since AI models disproportionately trust community content:
Track brand mentions on Reddit, Quora, and industry forums
Build authentic community presence (not just marketing)
Respond to discussions where your expertise is relevant
Step 4: Connect Visibility to Content
When you identify a gap, don't just note itβact on it:
Visibility Gap Detected β Analyze What's Cited β Create Citation-Ready Content β Track Impact
This is where Semrush falls short and purpose-built tools excel.
When Semrush AI Visibility Is Enough
Despite the gaps, Semrush's offering makes sense for certain users:
User Type | Recommendation |
|---|---|
Already paying for Semrush suite | Add AI Visibility for consolidated dashboard |
Need breadth over depth | 20+ platform coverage is valuable for monitoring |
Enterprise with custom reporting | Can work around limitations with internal tools |
Basic brand monitoring | Sufficient for awareness without action |
When You Need More
Scenario | Better Alternative |
|---|---|
Content-focused teams | Tools that connect visibility to generation |
ROI-focused marketers | Tools with GSC/GA integration |
Small budget | Dedicated tools often cheaper than Semrush + add-on |
AI-first strategy | Purpose-built platforms with actionable insights |
Key Takeaways
The Numbers That Matter
Metric | Value | Implication |
|---|---|---|
Zero-click searches | 58.5% U.S. | Traditional CTR metrics miss majority of impact |
AI Overviews peak | 24.61% | Significant portion of queries affected |
Reddit citations | 176.89%/query | Community content outperforms corporate sites |
Mentioned vs. trusted | 6-27% overlap | Being seen isn't being trusted |
The Gaps That Matter
No traffic attribution β Can't connect visibility to actual business outcomes
Basic monitoring β Shows data without actionable recommendations
No citation hierarchy β Treats all mentions as equal
Separate content tools β Visibility insights don't flow to content creation
Estimated vs. real data β GSC integration still "coming soon"
What To Do About It
Audit your current visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI
Connect to GSC for real traffic data (use MCP integration if available)
Track citation authority, not just mentions
Build community presence that AI models actually trust
Close the loop from visibility gaps to content creation
FAQ
Does Semrush track Google AI Overviews?
Yes, Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit monitors Google AI Overviews alongside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and 20+ other AI platforms. However, it provides monitoring data rather than actionable optimization recommendations.
How accurate is Semrush's AI visibility data?
Semrush provides estimated visibility scores based on their data collection methods. However, without GSC integration (still "coming soon"), you can't verify how AI visibility correlates with actual traffic and conversions. Their traditional traffic estimates are known to diverge from GSC by 10-15% on average.
Is Semrush AI Visibility worth the extra cost?
The AI Visibility add-on costs approximately $99/month on top of existing Semrush plans. For teams already invested in the Semrush ecosystem, it provides consolidated monitoring. For teams focused specifically on AI visibility with tighter budgets, dedicated tools may offer better value.
What's the difference between being mentioned and being cited?
Mentioned means AI references your brand in passing (e.g., "Brands like Nike and Adidas..."). Cited means AI uses your content as an authoritative source (e.g., "According to Nike's research..."). Only 6-27% of mentioned brands also achieve citation authority. Semrush tracks mentions but has limited visibility into this distinction.
How do I track AI visibility without expensive tools?
Start with manual monitoring: Weekly queries to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI for your target keywords. Document which brands get cited, including yourself. Use free GSC data as your source of truth for traffic impact. Graduate to paid tools when you need scale and automation.
Sources
Semrush AI Visibility Overview β Official product capabilities
Semrush AI Search Visibility Study β Reddit citation data, brand mention statistics
Semrush Zero-Click Searches β 58.5% zero-click statistic
Semrush AI Overviews Study β AI Overview percentages and trends
How to Measure Brand Visibility in AI Search β Search Engine Land methodology guide
Top AI Brand Visibility Monitoring Tools β RevenueZen tool comparison
Last updated: December 2025. AI visibility tools and Semrush features evolve rapidly. Verify current capabilities on official product pages.
About the Author

Co-founder of Ekamoira. Building AI-powered SEO tools to help brands achieve visibility in the age of generative search.
Ready to Get Cited in AI?
Discover what AI engines cite for your keywords and create content that gets you mentioned.
Try Ekamoira FreeRelated Articles

Semrush Alternatives for Small Businesses - A $50/Month Stack That Works
Semrush now costs $199/month minimum (up from $139.95) as of December 2025 > - Free tools (GSC, GA4, Keyword Planner, Screaming Frog) cover 80% of the needs
Christian Gaugeler
MCP vs Traditional APIs: When to Use Which for AI Agent Development
MCP and APIs solve different problems. APIs connect machines to machines. MCP connects AI to machines. Learn when to use each for your AI agent integrations.
Christian Gaugeler
Google Search Console MCP Servers Compared: Complete 2025 Guide
Compare every Google Search Console MCP server available in 2025. Includes setup complexity, features, limitations, and common pitfalls for ahonn, AminForou, Shin-sibainu, surendranb, and Ekamoira solutions.
Soumyadeep Mukherjee