Does ChatGPT Give the Same Answers to Everyone? The Complete Science of AI Response Variability (2026)
Last updated: January 6, 2026
According to OpenAI's GPT-5 System Card (August 2025), GPT-5 with thinking mode hallucinates in only 4.8% of responses—a dramatic reduction from GPT-4o's 20.6% and o3's 22% error rates. Yet even with these improvements, response variability remains a fundamental characteristic of all large language models, affecting the 800 million weekly ChatGPT users worldwide.
What You'll Learn in This Guide
| Topic | Key Insight |
|---|---|
| Hallucination Rates | GPT-5 Thinking: 4.8% vs GPT-4o: 20.6% vs o3: 22% |
| Factual Accuracy | GPT-5 is 45% less likely to contain errors than GPT-4o |
| Response Consistency | GPT-5.2 Thinking has 38% fewer errors than GPT-5.1 |
| Temperature Control | GPT-5 models no longer support temperature adjustment |
| Memory Feature | April 2025 update references all past conversations |
| User Scale | 800 million weekly active users as of December 2025 |
Research Methodology
This analysis synthesizes peer-reviewed research, official OpenAI documentation, and controlled experiments to provide the most comprehensive guide on ChatGPT response variability available.
Primary Sources Analyzed:
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card (August 2025) — Official hallucination benchmarks
- OpenAI GPT-5.2 announcement (December 2025) — Accuracy improvements
- Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025-2026) — Cross-model comparison
- EPFL/ETH Zurich randomized controlled trial — Personalization impact study
- AEO Agency Team geographic study (2025) — Location influence testing
Data Verification Protocol: All statistics are traceable to primary sources. Where multiple sources reported conflicting data, we prioritized official OpenAI documentation, then peer-reviewed research.
Does ChatGPT Ever Give Identical Answers?
ChatGPT generates unique responses for each interaction due to its probabilistic architecture. Unlike databases that retrieve fixed information, ChatGPT constructs every response through next-token prediction.
This variability persists even in GPT-5.2, the latest model released December 11, 2025. While GPT-5.2 Thinking produces "38% fewer errors than its predecessor," complete determinism remains architecturally impossible.
"Modern reasoning models like GPT-5, o3, and o4-mini disable sampling parameters such as temperature and top_p because their internal generation process likely involves multiple rounds of reasoning, verification, and selection." — OpenAI Developer Community, 2025
What Factors Cause ChatGPT Response Variability?
Based on our analysis, we've developed the AI Response Variability Spectrum—a framework categorizing the factors that cause ChatGPT to generate different answers:
Tier 1: Controllable Factors
| Factor | Impact Level | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt specificity | High | Use detailed, constrained prompts |
| Custom instructions | High | Set persistent preferences in settings |
| Conversation context | Medium | Maintain relevant history |
| Role definitions | Medium | Begin with clear role framing |
| Reasoning effort parameter | Medium | Use reasoning_effort instead of temperature |
Tier 2: Platform-Level Factors
| Factor | Impact Level | What Happens |
|---|---|---|
| Memory personalization | High | System recalls all past conversations (April 2025) |
| Model version | High | GPT-5.2 vs GPT-5 vs GPT-4o produce different outputs |
| Geographic location | Medium | Responses adapt to detected user location |
| Thinking mode | Medium | Enables multi-step reasoning with lower error rates |
Tier 3: Architectural Factors
| Factor | Impact Level | Technical Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Sparse MoE routing | High | Token routing to different "expert" networks |
| Multi-round reasoning | High | Internal verification steps introduce variance |
| Log probability variance | High | Inherent randomness in probability calculations |
Source: OpenAI GPT-5 System Card, August 2025
Why Did OpenAI Remove Temperature Control?
A critical change in GPT-5: temperature control has been disabled. Unlike previous models where users could set temperature from 0 to 2, GPT-5 only supports temperature=1:
"Developers who try to set a different temperature value receive the error: 'Unsupported value: temperature does not support 0.2 with this model.'"
| Model Generation | Temperature Control | Alternative Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-3.5 / GPT-4 | 0.0 - 2.0 range | seed parameter |
| GPT-4o | 0.0 - 2.0 range | seed parameter |
| GPT-5 / GPT-5.2 | Fixed at 1.0 only | reasoning_effort, verbosity |
"Without temperature control, the industry loses repeatability. The variance itself becomes a risk factor we have to account for." — Swept.ai Industry Analysis, 2025
How Do GPT-5 and GPT-5.2 Handle Response Variability?
GPT-5 Launch (August 7, 2025)
OpenAI released GPT-5 on August 7, 2025:
| Metric | GPT-5 (Thinking) | GPT-5 (Standard) | GPT-4o | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hallucination Rate | 4.8% | 11.6% | 20.6% | 77% reduction |
| Factual Error Rate | ~45% fewer | — | Baseline | 45% improvement |
| Healthcare Hallucinations | 1.6% | — | 12.9% | 88% reduction |
"GPT-5 is significantly less likely to hallucinate than previous models. With web search enabled, GPT-5's responses are ~45% less likely to contain a factual error than GPT-4o." — OpenAI, August 2025
GPT-5.2 Launch (December 11, 2025)
OpenAI released GPT-5.2 in response to Google's Gemini 3:
| Metric | GPT-5.2 | GPT-5.1 | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Error Rate (Thinking) | 38% fewer | Baseline | +38% accuracy |
| Context Window | 400,000 tokens | 200,000 tokens | 2x capacity |
| Knowledge Cutoff | August 31, 2025 | September 30, 2024 | 11 months newer |
"The real improvement in GPT-5.2 is consistency. Where earlier models would forget details mid-conversation, GPT-5.2's Thinking model appears to hold onto relevant information much more reliably." — OpenAI, December 2025
How Does ChatGPT's Memory Feature Affect Responses?
On April 10, 2025, OpenAI announced a major update to ChatGPT's memory. The system now references all past conversations.
| Memory Type | How It Works | User Control |
|---|---|---|
| Saved Memories | Details you explicitly ask to remember | Full control |
| Chat History References | Insights from past conversations | Limited |
"ChatGPT now references your recent conversations to provide more personalized responses. If you once said you like Thai food, it may take that into account." — TechCrunch, April 2025
Does Your Location Change What ChatGPT Tells You?
A controlled experiment by AEO Agency Team (2025) confirmed location-based adaptation:
"Interestingly, when directly asked, ChatGPT categorically denies that its responses depend on user geolocation. However, in practice, the system monitors session data."
| Query Type | Location Dependency |
|---|---|
| Geo-dependent ("Best restaurants nearby") | High |
| Non-obviously geo-dependent ("Popular trends") | Medium |
| Geo-independent ("Explain photosynthesis") | Low |
How Persuasive Are Personalized ChatGPT Responses?
A randomized controlled trial from EPFL and ETH Zurich (2024):
"Participants who debated GPT-4 with access to their personal information had 81.7% higher odds of increased agreement compared to participants who debated humans."
| Condition | Opponent | Personalization | Persuasive Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Human | Disabled | Baseline |
| B | Human | Enabled | Marginal improvement |
| C | GPT-4 | Disabled | Higher than human |
| D | GPT-4 | Enabled | 81.7% higher odds |
Which AI Model Has the Lowest Hallucination Rate?
| Model | Hallucination Rate | Best Domain |
|---|---|---|
| Gemini 2.0 Flash | 0.7% | General knowledge |
| OpenAI o3-mini-high | 0.8% | Reasoning tasks |
| GPT-5.2 Pro | ~1.5% | Complex analysis |
| GPT-4o | 1.5% | Legacy compatibility |
| Claude 4.5 Sonnet | 4.4% | Uncertainty acknowledgment |
"Hallucination rates dropped from 21.8% in 2021 to just 0.7% in 2025—a 96% improvement." — All About AI, 2025
How Many People Are Affected by Response Variability?
| Date | Weekly Active Users | Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|
| November 2023 | 100 million | Baseline |
| August 2024 | 200 million | +100% |
| December 2024 | 300 million | +50% |
| February 2025 | 400 million | +33% |
| December 2025 | 800 million | +100% |
10 Strategies for Consistent ChatGPT Responses
- Use detailed, constrained prompts — Specific prompts narrow the probability space
- Leverage reasoning_effort parameter — Use minimal for deterministic tasks
- Implement custom instructions — Set persistent preferences
- Use GPT-5.2 Thinking mode — 38% fewer errors
- Manage conversation context — Start fresh for new topics
- Request explicit formatting — Structural elements remain consistent
- Use temporary chats — For uninfluenced responses
- Implement verification workflows — Human review for critical content
- Document successful prompts — Build a reusable prompt library
- Consider multi-model verification — Cross-verify with Claude
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does ChatGPT give different answers to different people?
ChatGPT generates unique responses through probability-based next-token prediction. According to OpenAI's GPT-5 System Card, even GPT-5 with thinking mode has a 4.8% hallucination rate. Factors include conversation history, custom instructions, memory personalization (since April 2025), geographic location, and Sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture.
Does GPT-5 eliminate response variability?
No. While GPT-5 reduces hallucinations by 80% when using thinking mode, it removes temperature control entirely. OpenAI only supports temperature=1 for GPT-5.
What is GPT-5.2 and how does it improve consistency?
GPT-5.2 released December 11, 2025 with 38% fewer errors, 400,000 token context window, and improved consistency in long workflows.
How does ChatGPT's memory feature affect response variability?
Since April 10, 2025, ChatGPT references all past conversations for personalization, creating significant variability between users.
Which AI model has the lowest hallucination rate in 2026?
According to Vectara Leaderboard 2025-2026, Gemini 2.0 Flash leads at 0.7%, followed by GPT-5.2 Pro at ~1.5%.
Does geographic location influence ChatGPT responses?
Yes. A controlled study by AEO Agency Team (2025) confirmed ChatGPT adapts responses based on geolocation.
How persuasive are personalized ChatGPT responses?
A randomized controlled trial by EPFL/ETH Zurich found 81.7% higher persuasion odds compared to humans.
How many people use ChatGPT?
800 million weekly active users as of December 2025, with 92% of Fortune 500 companies using OpenAI products.
Can businesses rely on ChatGPT for consistent brand voice?
Partially. Use custom instructions, detailed prompts, and human review for final brand alignment.
What's the best way to get consistent ChatGPT responses in 2026?
Use detailed prompts, GPT-5.2 Thinking mode, reasoning_effort parameter, custom instructions, and human verification.
Sources
- OpenAI GPT-5 System Card — August 2025
- Introducing GPT-5.2 | OpenAI — December 2025
- Temperature in GPT-5 models — OpenAI Community
- ChatGPT memory update April 2025
- Geographic Location Study — AEO Agency 2025
- EPFL/ETH Zurich Persuasiveness Study — arXiv 2024
- Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard — 2025-2026
- ChatGPT User Statistics — December 2025
Last updated: January 6, 2026
About the Author
Founder of Ekamoira. Helping brands achieve visibility in AI-powered search through data-driven content strategies.
of brands invisible in AI
Our proprietary Query Fan-Out Formula predicts exactly which content AI will cite. Get visible in your topic cluster within 30 days.
Free 15-min strategy session · No commitment
Related Articles
Best AI Brand Visibility Tools 2026: 27+ Platforms Compared by Capability Tier
This guide compares 27 AI brand visibility tools available in 2026 -- organized not by price, but by what they actually do.
Christian Gaugeler
ChatGPT Instant Checkout Is Live: What Retailers Need to Do This Week (February 2026)
OpenAI launched 'Buy it in ChatGPT' with Instant Checkout on February 16, 2026, powered by the Agentic Commerce Protocol codeveloped with Stripe. This guide covers the technical architecture, fee structure, onboarding paths, and exactly what retailers need to do this week to participate.
Christian Gaugeler
Query Fan-Out: Original Research on How AI Search Multiplies Every Query (And Why 88% of Brands Are Invisible)
A December 2025 study by Surfer SEO analyzing 173,902 URLs across 10,000 keywords found that 68% of pages cited in AI Overviews were NOT in the top 10 organic r...
Ekamoira Research Team